CO129-193 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [5-7] — Page 366

I a white vol:& Colonel Stuart's at

p.p. 27:

32059

of the latter, & the Arbitrator's Report at p. 171.

I may further call attention to the Acting Attorney General's opinion on the legal aspect of the claim (6.41) & some antecedents & letters reflecting on Mr Price's delays in reporting on pp. 85-87. I have also added pencil references in the margin of the Desp: to the pages White vol: referred to by

the case

He

The Governor.

From p. 89 of the three vol: the contents appear with topure exceptions to be the same as on the white vol..

Mr. Cough the original (of which a faint is given

referent memorial However ab

in his family)

6.94, the further observations by dat Coughlin

the in important evidence taken

by the Arbitrator including

Coughtime's, Mr M Kein

& Mr Dowdle's contention.

El

362

I Watt

behalf of the harvey on fencial:

Debts are

to be

found only in

The three volume. (Places marked) the points of difference not Satisfactorily cleared up In Coughlin

1. that the new drain brought

an addition

of water too great for the old drain to carry away.

2. that the Inesting was immediately caused by the old drain getting choked up with boulders and being out of repair (Her duty wults widence), & by the displacement of the two large stones by the force of water

Sat. Rice.

1. That it was

large enough & with fall enough &

away

carry, three times the

quantity. 2. that the drain

was not choked with sand or boulders & could not have been. to the wish of

water

being very great. two latter

that the stones

were displaced by

The water